So here you are first to read of his arachnoid derivations.
Or perhaps you already know the premise of his findings?
Ernst sketches it out like this . . .
Number, Structural Economy and Tensile Strength
Significant Median Angle of Cobweb Radials is ≈12.7°
a division, which, within 360°, equals 28 Radials.

Consider then the Spokes of a Mountain Bike Wheel (Optimum Lightweight/Strength/Spokes Correlation)
Number of Spokes = Median between 24 and 32 = 28
The Significant Number is 28 radials
Spider and Man are in perfect accord ?
Can we then assume the ‘lacing’ of a cobweb and the lacing of a mountainbike’s wheel spokes have a preordained correlation identified some two thousand years ago, when considerations of strength and economy of means were formulated for the dome of the Pantheon — the temple dedicated to ‘All the Gods’ — now one of the best-preserved of all Ancient Roman buildings?
![]() |
29 Radials (near mean-optimum) Photo credit: Fir0002/Flagstaffotos |
![]() |
|
Ernst asks: What did the Ancients know? What does the spider know? |
You are reading it here first.
A recent study of cobwebs (2021)* shows that extracted geometrical numeric values can elucidate how spider web utilisation has the potential to guide development of optimised fibre oriented reinforced composite structures for constructing such figurations as shell structures, pressure vessels and fuselage cones for the aviation industry. The statistical results depict the opening angle utilisation by the spider for web construction, and the cumulative mean of all collected samples shows that the favourable angle of the spider for orientation in web construction is ≈12.7°.



No comments:
Post a Comment